The Francis Crick Institute

It reframes air quality as cancer policy rather than respiratory policy, and it explains the shape of lung cancer in never-smokers: the mutations are common and mostly silent, and what differs is whether something inflames the tissue enough to let one of them grow.

Relapse after surgery is driven by particular subclones that can be identified in the primary tumour and tracked in blood, which argues for evolution-aware adjuvant strategies. The pollution finding reframes carcinogenesis: some agents promote already-mutant cells rather than causing mutations.

The foundation of minimal residual disease testing in lung cancer: a blood test that says a patient will relapse months before a scan does, and says which part of the tumour is doing it. Whether acting on that signal changes outcome is what the ctDNA-guided trials are for.

Lung cancers keep evolving after they form, and it is ongoing chromosomal instability rather than the number of mutations that best predicts who will relapse. This gives a rationale for targeting the earliest (clonal) drivers and neoantigens and for tracking evolution in blood after surgery.

A single biopsy is an incomplete picture of a patient's cancer. Truncal mutations shared by all cells (in kidney cancer, VHL) are the most reliable drug targets, whereas mutations in only some branches predict resistance. This is why liquid biopsy and multi-region sampling matter.