Trials and papersMultiple myeloma

For someone offered the test, these are the numbers that describe what a result means in an NHS population: about 1 in 100 tests came back positive each year, between 46 and 58 in 100 positives were cancer, and a negative result left about 1 in 100 with an undetected cancer within the year. The test found between a quarter and a third of all cancers diagnosed in a screening round, and about half to two thirds of the 12 cancer types it was designed to find. Whether finding them this way reduces late-stage diagnoses is the primary question, and this paper says only that the answer was no; the primary-endpoint paper had not appeared on Europe PMC by 23 September 2026.

CEPHEUS extends the quadruplet standard to patients who are not going to transplant, closing the gap between transplant-eligible and ineligible populations. It is also one of the first phase 3 trials to be designed around MRD-negativity as the primary endpoint, which could shorten future myeloma trials by years. Frailer patients still need dose-adapted approaches.

PERSEUS, with the earlier GRIFFIN and CASSIOPEIA trials, made a four-drug daratumumab quadruplet the standard for fit patients heading to transplant. It also introduced MRD-directed stopping of the antibody, a step towards treatment that is deep but not indefinite. Whether transplant itself remains necessary on top of a quadruplet is now the open question.

CARTITUDE-4 is the first randomised trial to show that a CAR-T improves survival in myeloma, and it moved cilta-cel into second-line use (FDA approval 2024). For patients whose disease returns after first-line lenalidomide, a one-off cell therapy now competes with continuous drug combinations. Capacity, cost and the need for bridging therapy still limit who actually receives it.

The clinical result is in line with commercial BCMA CAR-T products, but the point of the paper is the manufacturing: an academic hospital produced its own CAR-T cells, infused them fresh and treated patients who would otherwise wait for a commercial slot. It is the evidence base for what Immix Biopharma now develops as NXC-201.

KarMMa-3 was the first randomised evidence that CAR-T beats conventional drugs in myeloma and led to ide-cel's approval after two prior lines. It confirmed that earlier use of CAR-T produces deeper and longer remissions than in the end-stage setting. Because responses are shorter than with cilta-cel and OS was not improved, it also sharpened debate about which BCMA CAR-T to use and when.

Elranatamab confirmed that BCMA bispecifics are a class, not a one-off, and its protocol-built dose reduction after response set a precedent for lowering the immunosuppressive burden of T-cell engagers. Patients now have two approved BCMA bispecifics and one against GPRC5D (talquetamab). Choosing between them, and sequencing them with CAR-T, remains guided by availability and toxicity profile rather than head-to-head data.

Teclistamab showed that an off-the-shelf bispecific can approach CAR-T-like response rates in late myeloma, giving patients who cannot wait for or access cell therapy a real option. It also exposed the price: prolonged T-cell engagement causes profound immunosuppression, so infection prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement are now routine. Less frequent dosing after response is being adopted to reduce this burden.