WINTHER was the first trial to pick cancer drugs using RNA, comparing what genes a tumour switched on against a biopsy of the patient's normal tissue, for patients whose DNA showed no obvious target. It missed its formal goal, but showed the approach was workable and that better-matched treatment went with better outcomes.
WINTHER was run by the WIN Consortium, an international network founded around Gustave Roussy, and enrolled 303 patients between 2013 and 2015 at Gustave Roussy, Vall d'Hebron, Sheba Medical Center, McGill and UC San Diego. Each patient had a tumour biopsy and a matched normal tissue biopsy. Arm A used DNA sequencing (Foundation Medicine's panel) to match a targeted drug; patients with no DNA match moved to arm B, where a transcriptomic algorithm ranked drugs by the difference in gene expression between the tumour and the normal tissue. In all, 107 patients were treated, 69 in the DNA arm and 38 in the RNA arm.
The primary endpoint, comparing each patient's progression-free survival on study therapy with their progression-free survival on their previous line of treatment, was not met in either arm, so the trial is formally negative. The Nature Medicine report in 2019 nonetheless showed that RNA-based matching was feasible at scale across countries, that treatment recommendations could be produced within a clinically useful time, and that a higher matching score and less prior therapy were associated with longer progression-free survival, echoing I-PREDICT.
WINTHER's lasting effects are methodological: it normalised matched-normal biopsies, showed transcriptomics can widen the pool of patients with a rational option, and informed the design of later WIN Consortium trials that combine DNA, RNA and immune profiling. It also illustrated how hard it is to prove benefit with a within-patient comparison rather than a randomised control.
Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.
303 enrolled.
Pre-specified primary endpoint not met; 303 consented, 107 evaluable for therapy
Source| Endpoint | Arm | n | Value | HR (95% CI) | p | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free survival ratio above 1.5 against the prior line of therapyprimary | All evaluable patients (arms A and B) | 107 | 22.4% | - | - | link |
| Stable disease 6 months or longer, or partial or complete response | Arm A (DNA-guided) | 69 | 23.2% | - | 0.37 | link |
| Arm B (RNA expression-guided) | 38 | 31.6% |
Shares Razelle Kurzrock, Cancer variant knowledgebases and molecular tumour boards, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, Foundation Medicine (Roche).
Shares Razelle Kurzrock, Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Rare cancers, Basket, umbrella, and platform trials.
Shares Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Rare cancers, Basket, umbrella, and platform trials, Comprehensive genomic profiling.
Shares Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Rare cancers, Basket, umbrella, and platform trials, Comprehensive genomic profiling.
Shares Cancer variant knowledgebases and molecular tumour boards, Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Comprehensive genomic profiling.
Shares Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Rare cancers, Basket, umbrella, and platform trials, Comprehensive genomic profiling.
Shares Basket, umbrella, and platform trials, RNA sequencing & expression profiling, Comprehensive genomic profiling.
Shares Foundation Medicine (Roche), Master protocol (platform, basket and umbrella trials), Basket, umbrella, and platform trials, Comprehensive genomic profiling.