Testing people who have no symptoms to catch cancer, or its precursors, early enough to cure. Proven for breast, cervical, colorectal and (in smokers) lung cancer; every test also finds some cancers that would never have caused harm.
A good screening test must find cancers at a stage where treatment changes the outcome, be acceptable and affordable for millions of healthy people, and cause more benefit than harm from false positives, unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis; it is judged ultimately by whether it lowers deaths in randomised trials. Mammography, cervical smears and HPV testing, colonoscopy and stool tests, and low-dose CT for heavy smokers meet this bar; PSA testing for prostate cancer is a marginal case where shared decision-making is advised. Multi-cancer early detection blood tests such as Galleri aim to screen for dozens of cancers at once and are being tested in large trials, with the risks of overdiagnosis and false reassurance under close scrutiny.
Showing the technology this term belongs to: Mammography & tomosynthesis.
For someone offered the test, these are the numbers that describe what a result means in an NHS population: about 1 in 100 tests came back positive each year, between 46 and 58 in 100 positives were cancer, and a negative result left about 1 in 100 with an undetected cancer within the year. The test found between a quarter and a third of all cancers diagnosed in a screening round, and about half to two thirds of the 12 cancer types it was designed to find. Whether finding them this way reduces late-stage diagnoses is the primary question, and this paper says only that the answer was no; the primary-endpoint paper had not appeared on Europe PMC by 23 September 2026.
The only national prophylactic cholecystectomy programme in the world has run for nearly twenty years without a design that can show whether it works. Targeting by region and risk, and building in an evaluation, is the obvious next step.
This is the polyp pathway UK radiologists and surgeons follow (a UK author, Foley, leads it). It is a surveillance-and-surgery guideline built on low to moderate quality evidence, and the Kaiser Permanente cohort published two years earlier questions whether following small polyps finds cancer at all.
The evidence base for setting the age at which screening starts by risk rather than by birthday. It is also a warning: the same score performs differently across ancestries, so a risk model built and validated in European cohorts will under-serve the men at highest risk.
The largest natural history study of gallbladder polyps undermines the surveillance half of the 2022 European guideline: small polyps grow as a matter of course and almost never become cancer, while size at first scan carries most of the risk.
The disparity in prostate cancer death among Black men in the United States is, stage for stage and treatment for treatment, largely a disparity in getting standard care rather than in tumour biology. The disparity that survives equal access is in dying of everything else, which is the part a cancer service is least organised to fix and most able to measure.
The Indian epidemiology matters to the NHS: people of South Asian heritage make up a large part of several English cities, and Asian ethnicity is a named risk factor in the European polyp guideline.
The current shape of the screening question in the United States, and the best short statement of the trade-off in numbers a man can weigh. The three-to-one ratio between metastatic cases prevented and deaths prevented is also the argument for using metastatic presentation, not mortality, to judge a screening programme sooner.
Shares USPSTF 2012: screening for prostate cancer, recommendation statement (grade D), Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer, Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening, 1986 to 2005, Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.
Shares Outcomes of Gallbladder Polyps and Their Association With Gallbladder Cancer in a 20-Year Cohort, Risk-targeted ultrasound screening in high-incidence regions, tested against usual care, USPSTF 2012: screening for prostate cancer, recommendation statement (grade D), Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.
Shares USPSTF 2012: screening for prostate cancer, recommendation statement (grade D), Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer, Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening, 1986 to 2005, Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.
Shares Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer, PLCO: mortality results from a randomised prostate cancer screening trial, Shield, ERSPC: screening and prostate cancer mortality in a randomised European study.
Shares Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer, Association of Black race with prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality, PLCO: mortality results from a randomised prostate cancer screening trial, Lead time, and lead-time bias.
Shares Risk-targeted ultrasound screening in high-incidence regions, tested against usual care, Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction, USPSTF 2012: screening for prostate cancer, recommendation statement (grade D), Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.
Shares Polygenic risk score (PRS), Number needed to screen (and number needed to diagnose), PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System), PROMIS: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer.
Shares Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in India, Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE, Systematic review with meta-analysis: the relationship between chronic Salmonella typhi carrier status and gall-bladder cancer, Outcomes of Gallbladder Polyps and Their Association With Gallbladder Cancer in a 20-Year Cohort.