Binghe Xu

Chinese patients in the trial saw the same pattern as the global population: a clear progression-free survival gain, no proven survival gain, and a different rather than heavier side-effect burden, with mouth and eye toxicity in nearly half. It supports use of datopotamab deruxtecan in this setting in China but does not resolve the global trial's missing survival benefit.

Ribociclib is a second adjuvant CDK4/6 option, and the only one with data in node-negative stage II disease. Roughly 3 in 100 patients avoid a relapse or death at three years, so the decision depends heavily on individual risk, tolerance of a three-year oral drug, and cost. Whether the benefit persists after treatment ends, as it did with abemaciclib, needs longer follow-up.

For hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer that has already had chemotherapy, Dato-DXd controls the disease for longer with fewer severe side effects than chemotherapy, but does not help patients live longer, so it is not a standard option here. The result is a reminder that progression-free survival is a surrogate; regulators and clinicians should wait for survival data before adopting an ADC in a setting where later therapies are effective.

For HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane, trastuzumab deruxtecan is now the standard second-line treatment and T-DM1 has moved later in the sequence. The benefit is large enough that ADC design, not just the target, is understood to be what matters. Patients need lung monitoring because of the risk of pneumonitis.

Patients whose breast cancer was previously called HER2-negative may now be eligible for an effective HER2-directed drug if their tumour has even low-level HER2 staining, so pathology reports must now distinguish HER2-low (1+ or 2+/ISH-negative) from HER2-zero. This applies to metastatic disease after at least one line of chemotherapy; it does not mean these patients benefit from trastuzumab or other older HER2 drugs.