Shun Lu

The survival benefit first reported in 2023 has held five years after the last dose of adjuvant osimertinib, which answers the worry that a three-year course only delays relapse. Patients with an exon 19 deletion gained most; the L858R estimate crosses one and is less certain. Nothing here changes the recommendation, which already rests on the 2023 analysis, but it tightens the case for testing every resected non-squamous tumour for EGFR mutations.

Useful for a patient offered adagrasib after chemotherapy or immunotherapy who wants the trial explained without jargon. It adds no new data; the primary KRYSTAL-12 publication and the trial page remain the reference for the numbers.

Patients newly diagnosed with EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer now have a first-line option that improves survival over osimertinib, particularly if they have high-risk features. The trade-off is intravenous (now subcutaneous) infusions and considerably more skin, nail and clotting toxicity, so osimertinib alone remains reasonable for those who prioritise convenience and tolerability. Both this regimen and osimertinib plus chemotherapy (FLAURA2) are approved; there is no direct comparison.

Patients with operable stage II-III lung cancer without EGFR or ALK alterations should have chemo-immunotherapy discussed before surgery rather than only afterwards. Three pre-operative cycles do not compromise the operation and improve cure rates. Whether to continue immunotherapy after surgery, as the perioperative trials do, and whether patients with pCR need any further treatment, remain open questions.

Every resected non-squamous lung cancer should be tested for EGFR mutations, because patients who carry one live longer if they take osimertinib for three years after surgery. The trial does not tell us whether adjuvant chemotherapy can be omitted, nor what happens on relapse after osimertinib, and the three-year duration was chosen empirically.