The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, known as the Red Journal, is the American Society for Radiation Oncology's journal and the main US venue for radiotherapy trials, dose and fractionation evidence, physics and toxicity research, including NRG and RTOG cooperative-group results. Access is hybrid.
The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (IJROBP), known as the Red Journal, is the journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), founded in 1975 and published by Elsevier on a hybrid access model. It is the main US venue for radiation oncology trials, dose-fractionation evidence, physics and toxicity research, publishing NRG and RTOG cooperative-group trials, stereotactic and hypofractionation studies, radiobiology and ASTRO clinical practice guidelines, with the ASTRO annual meeting abstracts as a supplement. Its readers are radiation oncologists, physicists and radiobiologists. Within OnCo it is related to the ASTRO Annual Meeting source and linked from the Albert Koong and Anthony Zietman biographies.
A second publication from the CONVERT trial, later than the first and described in its title as an update or longer-term analysis. Read it with the primary publication linked from the trial page; the record was linked automatically and its figures have not been checked by hand.
For men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, protons and modern IMRT give the same excellent quality of life and cancer control, so the choice can rest on access, cost and convenience rather than on an expected sparing of bowel or bladder. The result removes prostate cancer from the list of adult indications where a proton advantage was assumed but untested.
One trial page and one technology page on OnCo cite this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing pages listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One trial page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
A proton plan that looks safe on a 1.1 RBE map can still over-dose a late-responding organ sitting on the distal edge. Comparing protons with IMRT without an LET-weighted view asks the wrong physical question.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Albert Koong is a radiation oncologist leading MD Anderson's radiation department, with a focus on pancreatic cancer and SBRT.
Led the proton dose-escalation trial in prostate cancer and the comparative-effectiveness debate over proton therapy.
A second publication from the CONVERT trial, later than the first and described in its title as an update or longer-term analysis. Read it with the primary publication linked from the trial page; the record was linked automatically and its figures have not been checked by hand.
For men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, protons and modern IMRT give the same excellent quality of life and cancer control, so the choice can rest on access, cost and convenience rather than on an expected sparing of bowel or bladder. The result removes prostate cancer from the list of adult indications where a proton advantage was assumed but untested.
One trial page and one technology page on OnCo cite this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing pages listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One trial page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Shares ASTRO Annual Meeting, Anthony L. Zietman.