• Curettage and cautery: Scraping a small, low-risk skin cancer away with a spoon-shaped blade under local anaesthetic and then sealing the surface with heat, usually repeated two or three times in the same sitting.
• The next skin cancer: second primaries after a keratinocyte cancer: The likeliest thing to happen after a basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma is not that this one comes back.
• Keratoacanthoma: the tumour that may be a squamous cell carcinoma: A dome-shaped lump with a central plug of keratin that grows fast over a few weeks and may then shrink on its own.
• Sun protection after a skin cancer diagnosis: Not a lecture but a short list: shade between 11am and 3pm, clothes and a wide-brimmed hat, SPF 30 or more with four or five UVA stars used generously and reapplied, never a sunbed, and a vitamin D supplement in winter because the rest of the list reduces it.
• The Brigham and Women's Hospital staging system, and why squamous cell carcinoma has two: The anatomical staging systems put almost every squamous cell carcinoma in one or two categories, so they cannot pick out the few that will spread.
• Skin grafts and flaps after skin cancer surgery: Two ways of closing a hole in the skin that is too big to stitch.
• The scar on the face after skin cancer surgery: Every skin cancer operation leaves a scar, and on a face it is the part people mind most.
• The margin in skin cancer surgery: When a skin cancer is cut out, the surgeon takes a rim of normal-looking skin around it, because the cancer reaches further than the eye can see.
• The subtype and grade on a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma report: A squamous cell carcinoma report carries two separate things: a subtype, which is the shape the tumour grows in, and a grade, which is how much it still looks like normal skin.
• Actinic keratosis (solar keratosis): sun damage, not cancer: Rough, scaly patches on skin that has had a lot of sun, commonest on the scalp, face, ears, forearms and backs of hands.

Biomarker results to ask for: BWH and AJCC-8 T stage, Perineural invasion, depth beyond fat, differentiation, Immunosuppression status, Gene-expression prognostic test (40-GEP, DecisionDx-SCC), PD-L1 (not required), TMB (very high), Grade: well, moderately or poorly differentiated, assigned from the most poorly differentiated region irrespective of percentage (RCPath G124), Subtype: acantholytic, desmoplastic, spindle cell or adenosquamous, each a high-risk feature on its own, Thickness over 4 mm, and level of invasion reaching or passing the subcutaneous fat, Perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion, Margins: involved at 0 mm, or clear but under 1 mm, Immunosuppression, which is not on the slide and is added by the clinician or the multidisciplinary team, UICC pathological T category, and separately the Brigham and Women's Hospital factor count where a clinician uses it.

Scans and tests linked to this cancer: Multidisciplinary tumour boards, Dermoscopy, total-body photography & AI skin analysis, Skin cancer screening (visual skin examination).

Bring copies of scan reports, pathology and blood results, and a list of every medicine and supplement.

• Radiotherapy after surgery, and what not to add to it: For high-risk disease, surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy of 60 to 66 Gy. The habit of adding chemotherapy, carried over from head and neck oncology, was tested in TROG 05.01: 321 patients randomised to postoperative radiotherapy with or without weekly carboplatin, with freedom from locoregional relapse at five years of 87 against 83 per cent, hazard ratio 0.84 (0.46 to 1.55, p=0.58), and no difference in disease-free or overall survival. Carboplatin should not be added. The control arm is the number to carry forward: surgery and radiotherapy alone controlled 83 per cent of these tumours locoregionally at five years, and only 7 per cent failed first at a distant site. (TROG 05.01 (chemotherapy added to radiotherapy after surgery for high-risk skin squamous cell carcinoma), Radiotherapy for skin cancer, Carboplatin, Perineural invasion (PNI))
• Before surgery, when the operation would be disfiguring: Up to four doses of cemiplimab before an operation planned with curative intent. In 79 patients with resectable stage II to IV disease, a pathological complete response, meaning no viable tumour cells anywhere in the specimen on central review, was found in 40 (51 per cent, 39 to 62) and a pathological major response in a further 10 (13 per cent). Imaging understated it, at 68 per cent objective response. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 18 per cent. What the trial does not answer is whether the surgery can then be reduced or omitted, because everyone was resected; that is the next question and it is the same one being asked in rectal and bladder cancer. (Neoadjuvant cemiplimab for resectable stage II to IV skin squamous cell carcinoma, Cemiplimab, Pathologic complete response (pCR), The margin in skin cancer surgery)
• Localised low- and high-risk: Excision with margin control or Mohs micrographic surgery; adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk features (perineural invasion, positive margins); nodal evaluation for very high risk. (IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Sentinel lymph node biopsy)
• High-risk after surgery and radiotherapy: Adjuvant cemiplimab (C-POST, 2025: reduced locoregional and distant recurrence). (Cemiplimab)
• Locally advanced or metastatic: Cemiplimab, pembrolizumab or cosibelimab; neoadjuvant cemiplimab for resectable stage II-IV to shrink surgery (51% pCR). (Cemiplimab, Pembrolizumab, Cosibelimab)
• Which squamous cell carcinomas are the dangerous ones: Most of these are cured by removing them, and the British Association of Dermatologists says exactly that: most squamous cell carcinomas are low-risk skin cancers and can be cured, and a small number recur locally or spread to the lymph nodes or elsewhere. The useful thing is to know which is which, and two cohorts did the work. In a prospective study of 615 patients followed for a median of 43 months, no tumour 2.0 mm thick or less metastasised at all; metastases occurred in 12 of 318 tumours between 2.1 and 6.0 mm thick (4 percent) and in 14 of 90 thicker than 6.0 mm (16 percent). On multivariate analysis the factors that mattered were increasing thickness (hazard ratio 4.79), immunosuppression (4.32), a location on the ear (3.61) and increasing width (2.22); local recurrence was driven by thickness and by desmoplastic growth (16.11). In a ten-year cohort of 985 patients with 1,832 tumours, local recurrence occurred in 4.6 percent, nodal metastasis in 3.7 percent and death from the cancer in 2.1 percent, and the independent predictors of nodal spread and of death were a diameter of at least 2 cm, poor differentiation, invasion beyond the fat, and an ear or temple location, with perineural invasion also associated with death from the cancer. Those are the words to look for on your pathology report, and they are the ones that decide whether radiotherapy after surgery, imaging or a specialist team referral are discussed. Perineural invasion comes in two forms and the distinction changes the outlook: found only on the slide with no symptoms, or clinically evident through pain, altered sensation or weakness, which is the worse kind and the reason those symptoms are on the red cards. Treatment is surgical: the BAD says removal with a margin of normal skin under local anaesthetic, closed with stitches or sometimes a graft, with curettage and cautery for some lesions and Mohs in some circumstances, and radiotherapy as an alternative. It is the BAD's transplant leaflet rather than its squamous cell one that says when radiotherapy is chosen: for skin cancers that are difficult to remove with surgery or have a high risk of returning after it. A pooled analysis of observational studies put local recurrence at 3.0 percent after Mohs, 5.4 percent after standard excision and 6.4 percent after radiotherapy, while warning that the tumours sent to each were not comparable and that photodynamic therapy, at 26.4 percent, is not a treatment for an invasive squamous cell carcinoma. (Perineural invasion (PNI), Wide local excision, Mohs surgery, Curettage and cautery, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Skin cancer after an organ transplant, Multidisciplinary tumour boards, Curative intent vs palliative intent)
• Follow-up, the lymph nodes, and the chance of a second one: Follow-up after a squamous cell carcinoma is where the UK sources openly disagree, and it is better to know that than to be surprised by it. The BAD patient leaflet says current guidelines are that people at low risk of a second one do not need a specialist following them up, and that higher-risk cancers should be followed up regularly for one to two years by the specialist or their team. Cancer Research UK says a high-risk squamous cell carcinoma might mean appointments every four to six months for at least five years, and that a low-risk one might mean a single appointment and then none. Ask which your team is doing and why, because the answer tells you how they have classified your cancer. What is checked is your skin, all of it, and the lymph nodes nearest the original cancer; Cancer Research UK says tests may include a skin biopsy, an ultrasound or a CT scan, and that surgery to remove lymph nodes is uncommon for these cancers but is done if a squamous cell carcinoma has spread to them, which for a scalp or face primary means the nodes on the same side of the neck. Then the second question, which is more likely than recurrence. In the meta-analysis of 17 studies the three-year cumulative risk of a further squamous cell carcinoma after a first was 18 percent, at least ten times the general population rate, and the risk of also developing a basal cell carcinoma was about the same as for someone whose first cancer was a basal cell carcinoma. The BAD's leaflet puts it higher over five years: about 40 percent after a low-risk squamous cell carcinoma and possibly as high as 80 percent after a higher-risk one. This is why a dermatologist may treat skin that does not look like cancer to you: the BAD says treating areas of scaly sun damage, meaning actinic keratosis and Bowen disease, may reduce the risk of a squamous cell carcinoma, and describes large areas of such damage as field change. Three symptoms are worth a phone call rather than a wait: a new scaly or crusted lump that is growing, especially a painful one; a lump in the lymph nodes of the neck, armpit or groin on the side of a previous squamous cell carcinoma; and new numbness, tingling, burning pain or weakness in the face near where one was treated. (The next skin cancer: second primaries after a keratinocyte cancer, Perineural invasion (PNI), Sun protection after a skin cancer diagnosis, Skin cancer after an organ transplant, Chemoprevention & risk-reducing surgery, Survivorship care and late-effects surveillance, Field cancerisation, Sentinel lymph node biopsy)
• The transplant recipient and the immunosuppressed patient: A group with 65 to 100 times the ordinary risk, tumours that are multiple and far more likely to spread, and almost no evidence, because every registration trial excluded them. Three levers. Switching immunosuppression: TUMORAPA randomised 120 kidney transplant recipients who had already had one of these cancers and found new squamous cell carcinomas in 22 per cent after a switch to sirolimus against 39 per cent continuing a calcineurin inhibitor (relative risk 0.56, 0.32 to 0.98), at the price of 60 serious adverse events against 14 and 23 per cent stopping the drug. Chemoprevention: acitretin and nicotinamide, with the nicotinamide effect not reproduced in transplant recipients. Immunotherapy, long refused because of the risk to the graft: a twelve-patient phase 1 study that cross-tapered to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and pulsed prednisone around each cycle reported no rejection and no graft loss, with responses in 5 of 11 evaluable patients. That is the whole prospective evidence base. (Skin cancer after an organ transplant, TUMORAPA (switching from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus after a transplant skin cancer), Cemiplimab for kidney transplant recipients with advanced skin squamous cell carcinoma, Acitretin, Nicotinamide, Cemiplimab)
• What is available in England: NICE technology appraisal TA802 recommendation 1.1 recommends cemiplimab for metastatic or locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in adults when curative surgery or curative radiotherapy is not suitable, only if it is stopped at 24 months or earlier on progression and the company supplies it under the commercial arrangement. It replaced TA592, which had recommended it within the Cancer Drugs Fund. That single appraisal is the extent of NICE's appraisal guidance for this disease, though not of its guidance: pembrolizumab and cosibelimab have not been appraised for it, and the adjuvant indication that C-POST supports has no appraisal either, while HTG333 on electrochemotherapy, HTG99 on photodynamic therapy, NG12 recommendation 1.7.4 and QS130 all cover it. (Cemiplimab, Pembrolizumab, Cosibelimab, C-POST (cemiplimab after surgery and radiotherapy for high-risk skin squamous cell carcinoma))
• Immunotherapy-ineligible or refractory: Cetuximab ± radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, capecitabine; trials of intratumoural agents (RP1) and EGFR ADCs. (Cetuximab, Carboplatin, Vusolimogene oderparepvec)

From the standard of care recorded for this cancer; which apply depends on your stage and biomarkers. Ask which the team recommends and why.