Cytokine release syndrome (CRS)

An off-the-shelf alternative to CAR-T for repeatedly relapsed follicular lymphoma: no apheresis, no manufacturing wait, and a complete response rate in the same range, at the cost of continued treatment rather than a single infusion.

Patients with advanced synovial sarcoma, a rare cancer of young adults with few effective drugs, now have an approved cell therapy that produces responses lasting about a year in a substantial minority, if their tissue type and tumour antigen match. It proves that engineered T cells can work against a solid tumour when a good target is present, which had been elusive. It is not a cure for most, requires specialised centres, and only a minority of patients are eligible.

CARTITUDE-4 is the first randomised trial to show that a CAR-T improves survival in myeloma, and it moved cilta-cel into second-line use (FDA approval 2024). For patients whose disease returns after first-line lenalidomide, a one-off cell therapy now competes with continuous drug combinations. Capacity, cost and the need for bridging therapy still limit who actually receives it.

Patients with small-cell lung cancer that has relapsed after chemotherapy now have a drug that works far better than topotecan or lurbinectedin, and it is the first T-cell engager approved for a solid tumour. Treatment requires inpatient monitoring for the first doses because of cytokine release syndrome, which most centres now manage on a short-stay basis. It does not yet apply to first-line treatment, where trials are ongoing.

CD20 x CD3 bispecifics gave patients whose lymphoma has failed CAR-T, or who cannot access it, an effective off-the-shelf treatment that can be started within days. Epcoritamab and glofitamab are now standard third-line options and are moving into earlier lines and combinations. They do not yet replace CAR-T, whose remissions appear more durable.

KarMMa-3 was the first randomised evidence that CAR-T beats conventional drugs in myeloma and led to ide-cel's approval after two prior lines. It confirmed that earlier use of CAR-T produces deeper and longer remissions than in the end-stage setting. Because responses are shorter than with cilta-cel and OS was not improved, it also sharpened debate about which BCMA CAR-T to use and when.

Elranatamab confirmed that BCMA bispecifics are a class, not a one-off, and its protocol-built dose reduction after response set a precedent for lowering the immunosuppressive burden of T-cell engagers. Patients now have two approved BCMA bispecifics and one against GPRC5D (talquetamab). Choosing between them, and sequencing them with CAR-T, remains guided by availability and toxicity profile rather than head-to-head data.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel as an option in relapsed follicular and marginal zone lymphoma. Compared with tisagenlecleucel in ELARA, the response rates are higher and the neurological toxicity substantially greater, which is the trade-off a patient and centre weigh.