Someone must legally own a drug's licence to update its label and monitor safety. A non-profit could do this for old drugs proven to work in cancer that no company wants.
Regulatory systems assume a commercial marketing authorisation holder who files variations, maintains pharmacovigilance and supplies the product. For repurposed generics, no such holder has an incentive to act. Non-profit developers (Medicines Development for Global Health, DNDi, Cures Within Reach) have shown that non-profits can hold authorisations and run pharmacovigilance. The proposal is a non-profit oncology authorisation holder, funded by the repurposing fund and payers, that files new-indication applications, holds labels for repurposed generics, contracts manufacturing from generic makers, and runs the required safety monitoring.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.
Shares No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs, Regulatory divergence between regions.
Shares No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs, Regulatory divergence between regions.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.
Shares The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project, No incentive to repurpose cheap drugs.